Ethics
Exam
I
4
questions, 25 points each plus 10 points extra credit.
You
have one week to return this exam to me. It is now 4pm on May 25th.
Email
your answers as an attachment to my Mac email, eric.berg@mac.edu
Use
your Rachels text. I expect that you will work on your own and
direct questions to me.
Do
not plagiarize!
Question
#1 Religion and Ethics
Plato
asks us (by way of his character Socrates) the question: “Is
something good because God commands it, or does God command it
because it is good?” Explain the dilemma this presents for a
religious person. How would you answer this question from Socrates?
Immanuel
Kant makes the claim that “ought implies can”. In other words, in
the moral world, if we ought to do something, we can do it. How does
this claim fit with mental illness? Does this claim argue that we,
as humans, can be perfect?
I
made the claim in class that Christians and the Jewish faith share a
common set of moral rules, commonly called The 10 Commandments? What
do you think of Martin Luther’s claim that doing the right thing to
get to heaven or avoid hell (or purgatory) is a selfish thing to do?
Is he right or wrong? Why?
In
the world today, do we need religion to do the right thing? In other
words, if we eliminate religion do we eliminate the foundation of
Ethics? If yes, why? If no, why not?
Question
#2 Cultural Relativism
What
is the central argument for Cultural Relativism (CR)?
I
made several arguments against CR, clearly and completely outline one
argument against CR, and give an example to demonstrate how it works
against the CR position. What central value does the CR argument
wish to put forward in the world of moral thinking? Is this value
worth saving? Why or why not?
Question
#3 Egosim
What
is “ethical egoism?” (Be clear and complete)
What
is Psychological Egoism? What is the relationship between the two?
Explain
one argument against ethical egoism that you find compelling.
With
regard to your argument against egoism: construct a plausible
counterargument that a proponent of ethical egoism might make.
Speculate
intelligently about why someone might find the doctrine of ethical
egoism an appealing or attractive philosophical position.
Write
a short story (no more than 250 words) that will demonstrate ethical
egoism and the moral implications of the position.
Are all things relative? If yes, how is that true? If no, why not?
Clearly
distinguish between “cultural relativism” and “individual
relativism”.
If
relativism is true, what is the status of the study of political
science and the law?
Why do
ethicists distinguish between the law and ethics?
Why do
ethicists distinguish between etiquette and ethics?
Bonus: You all worked very hard to study for this exam. In reward for that work you may answer the following question for a maximum of 10 extra credit points.
With
the exception of any reading mentioned above, tell me about another
assigned reading from this section of the class. Try and outline the
argument as best you can and make an assessment of the merits of the
argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment