Ethics-Phil 250
Saving Private Ryan
For this film I will ask for the most of you as we are at
the end of the class. In the past, I
have directed our study of the film in a very focused way moving toward a more
advanced (and deeper learning experience) study sheet like we did with True Grit where I asked for longitudinal
character study. With this film I ask
that you pull the scenes from the
film and make an analysis of them using one or both methods (Consequentialism
[Mill] or Deontology [Kant]).
What I want you to do is the following;
·
Identify three scenes from the movie that
contains a moral dilemma. (example: When the General and the Colonels are
arguing if they should go after the last Ryan brother, one uses deontology [it
is just the right thing to do despite the consequences] and others argue the
consequences are too high) You may use this example.
·
Identify one or both methods used and who uses
it.
·
Outline the scene from the movie that
illuminates the elements of the moral dilemma and the argument.
·
Outline the argument(s) offered.
·
Connect these arguments to either
consequentialism and/or deontology.
·
Tell us the result.
·
Discuss if it was the best result given the
moral arguments at your disposal.
Refresher on Method:
Deontology:
Things are “just right or wrong” Malum in
se if you like. It is the intention
of the agent that counts, what did he or she intend to have happen. Consequences of an action do not count in the
calculation- we can’t accurately forecast actions so do not consider
consequences in your choices. Are people
treated as we would want to be treated? The moral needs of the individual can
override the needs of a group if a moral law has been identified. Remember how
to formulate a moral law (language and logic).
Consequentialism:
Things are wrong as they tend, or do produce happiness or reduce pain. The consequences of an action are what is
important. We try with the best data to
forecast results and go with it. The
moral needs of an individual rarely, if ever override the needs of the
group. The collective group is more
valuable than one individual. A decision
matrix is the best way to proceed but often there is not time so a “rough”
decision must be made based on consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment